Sonn comments on the influence of naturist views in the wider French anarchist movement:
PDF What does it mean to be a liberally educated person? It seems such a simple question, especially given the frequency with which colleges and universities genuflect toward this wellworn phrase as the central icon of their institutional missions.
Mantra-like, the words are endlessly repeated, starting in the glossy admissions brochures that high school students receive by the hundreds in their mailboxes and continuing right down to the last tired invocations they hear on commencement day. It would be surprising indeed if the phrase did not begin to sound at least a little empty after so much repetition, and surely undergraduates can be forgiven if they eventually regard liberal education as either a marketing ploy or a shibboleth.
Yet many of us continue to place great stock in these words, believing them to describe one of the ultimate goods that a college or university should serve.
So what exactly do we mean by liberal education, and why do we care so much about it? In speaking of "liberal" education, we certainly do not mean an education that indoctrinates students in the values of political liberalism, at least not in the most obvious sense of the latter phrase.
Rather, we use these words to describe an educational tradition that celebrates and nurtures human freedom. These days liberal and liberty have become words so mired in controversy, embraced and reviled as they have been by the far ends of the political spectrum, that we scarcely know how to use them without turning them into slogans—but they can hardly be separated from this educational tradition.
Liberal derives from the Latin liberalis, meaning "of or relating to the liberal arts," which in turn derives from the Latin word liber, meaning "free. Liberal education is built on these values: So one very simple answer to my question is that liberally educated people have been liberated by their education to explore and fulfill the promise of their own highest talents.
But what might an education for human freedom actually look like? Our current culture wars, our struggles over educational standards are all ultimately about the concrete embodiment of abstract values like "freedom" and "growth" in actual courses and textbooks and curricular requirements.
Should students be forced to take courses in American history, and if so, what should those courses contain? Should they be forced to learn a foreign language, encounter a laboratory science, master calculus, study grammar at the expense of creative writing or the reverseread Plato or Shakespeare or Marx or Darwin?
Should they be required to take courses that foster ethnic and racial tolerance? Even if we agree about the importance of freedom and growth, we can still disagree quite a lot about which curriculum will best promote these values.
That is why, when we argue about education, we usually spend less time talking about core values than about formal standards: This is not an easy question. Maybe that is why—in the spirit of E. Hirsch's Cultural Literacy and a thousand college course catalogs—our answers to it often take the form of lists: This impulse toward list making has in fact been part of liberal education for a very long time.
In their original medieval incarnation, the "liberal arts" were required courses, more or less, that every student was supposed to learn before attaining the status of a "free man. They were a very concrete list of seven subjects: Together, these were the forms of knowledge worthy of a free man.
We should remember the powerful class and gender biases that were built into this vision of freedom. The "free men" who studied the liberal arts were male aristocrats; these specialized bodies of knowledge were status markers that set them apart from "unfree" serfs and peasants, as well as from the members of other vulgar and ignoble classes.
Our modern sense of liberal education has expanded from this medieval foundation to include a greater range of human talents and a much more inclusive number of human beings, holding out at least the dream that everyone might someday be liberated by an education that stands in the service of human freedom.
And yet when we try to figure out what this education for human freedom might look like, we still make lists.
This essay will examine the degree to which nurture or nature influence early human development. Nurture strongly influences early human development, for many reasons. According to Locke (timberdesignmag.comy), the mind of a new born infant is a “blank slate”. Nature Vs Nurture Essay Examples. 21 total results. Nature vs. Nurture, One of the Oldest Psychological Debates The Concept of Nature Versus Nurture in Macbeth by William Shakespeare An Introduction to Nature Versus Nurture. words. 1 page. The Pursuit of Artificial Intelligence and Its Effect of Human Intelligence. 3, words. . Nature, nurture human diversity and personality. Discussion 2 My personality type is reliable. I am familiar with the Myers-Briggs personality test. The purpose of this personality test is to make the psychological types theory described by C.G. Jungle understandable to people. Thank you for making BrilliantTermpapers the custom essay.
We no longer hold up as a required curriculum the seven artes liberales of the medieval university; we no longer expect that the classical nineteenth-century college curriculum in Greek and Latin is enough to make a person learned.
But we do offer plenty of other complicated lists with which we try to identify the courses and distribution requirements that constitute a liberal education.Green anarchism (or eco-anarchism) is a school of thought within anarchism which puts a particular emphasis on environmental issues.A green anarchist theory is normally one that extends anarchist ideology beyond a critique of human interactions, and includes a critique of the interactions between humans and non-humans as well.
This often culminates in an anarchist revolutionary praxis that is. Nature and nurture: Forming attitudes and behaviors. Print Evolutional perspective which emphasizes on human kinship and cultural perspective which focuses on human diversity are the two main ideas that dominating the thinking of human similarities and differences in societies nowadays.
nature and nurture interact in forming our. papers. people. story. tag. wiki. Featured Sites. behavior bias consciousness culture economics education emotion evolution happiness judgment mind moral nature neuro nurture philosophy psychology puzzling reality Human Nature, Human Diversity.
Human Nature. Human Diversity. Family Environment. Discussion. Human Nature, Human Diversity. Essay: Nature vs. Nurture or The controversy over what determines who we are, whether it is Nature (heredity, our biological make up) or Nurture (our environment) is taking a new shape.
Through the past decades, psychologists have developed different theories to explain the characteristics of human-beings; how we feel, think and behave. In a nut shell, nature and nurture interact in forming our attitudes and behaviors. But just as I indicate the points above that in fact “nurture plays a bigger part than .
IQ tests measure intelligence, but not perfectly. For example, someone who makes a lucky guess on a multiple choice IQ test will get a higher score even though they are not more intelligent than someone who makes an unlucky guess.